From the author, in their own words...

Erin Coffman, Indiana University Indianapolis
Transcript:
Abstract:
This poster explores the implementation of specifications grading in a large-enrollment, technology-based business course. By shifting the focus from traditional grading to specifications-based assessment, this approach allows students to choose the grade they want—and do the associated work required. Logistics of how this approach was tested is summarized, but results are the focus of this poster. Across all skills evaluated in the course, students in alternatively-graded sections achieved higher passing rates than students in traditionally-graded sections. Additionally, student survey results indicate higher levels of confidence and control with regard to their grades from students in alternatively-graded sections.
Key Words:
Specifications Grading, Technology-Based Education, STEM Curriculum
Outcomes:
1. Assess viability of narrowing their course scope to 10–15 key “skills” versus dozens of learning objectives.
2. Compare and contrast student outcomes across different grading systems.
3. Construct a plan to test alternative grading systems within their own courses.
References:
Clark, David (2024, October 21) Common Questions About Standards-Based Grading. Grading for Growth. https://gradingforgrowth.com/p/common-questions-about-standards
Nilson, Linda (2014) Specifications Grading: Restoring Rigor, Motivating Students, and Saving Faculty Time. Routledge.
Talbert, Robert (2025, November 10) The Four Pillars of Alternative Grading. Grading for Growth. https://gradingforgrowth.com/p/the-four-pillars-of-alternative-grading
Talbert, Robert (2024, May 20) Promoting Student Growth with Engagement Credits. Grading for Growth. https://gradingforgrowth.com/p/promoting-student-growth-with-engagement

