top of page

Escape the Rubric Rut: Creative Strategies for Teaching Assessment Literacy

Presented by:

Angela D. Nagel, Western Kentucky University

Engaging strategies like exemplars, escape rooms, and AI feedback help teacher candidates build assessment fluency and confidence in designing, analyzing, and applying effective feedback.

Hear it from the author:
Escape the Rubric Rut: Creative Strategies for Teaching Assessment LiteracyAngela D. Nagel, Western Kentucky University
00:00 / 01:32
Hello, I’m Dr. Angela Nagel from Western Kentucky University. My poster, Escapethe Rubric Rut: Creative Strategiesfor Teaching Assessment Literacy, highlights innovative, hands-on ways to help teacher candidates become more confident, reflective, and fluent in assessment practices. Assessment literacy is one of the most essential—but also most overlooked—skills for pre-service teachers. Too often, it’s taught through static rubrics, compliance-driven assignments, or overly theoretical models that leave students confused or disengaged. I wanted to change that. In my undergraduate Classroom Assessment course, I redesigned the learning experience to be more interactive, student-centered, and grounded in real-world teaching practice. Instead of just reading about learning targets and rubrics, students practice analyzing them, deconstructing them, and even designing their own. On the poster, you’ll see some of the strategies I use: things like exemplar analysis routines where students explore quality versus poor samples, escape-room-style review games to make assessment concepts more memorable, and AI-supported feedback coaching that helps them practice giving meaningful, low-shame feedback to peers. Each activity is grounded in research—from Sadler’s feedback cycles to Wiggins & McTighe’s work on backward design—and each one helps students move beyond compliance and into genuine assessment fluency. The goal isn’t just to teach the mechanics of assessment—it’s to help future educators see assessment as a living, breathing part of instruction and student growth. My hope is that you’ll walk away with practical, creative ideas that bring assessment literacy to life in your own courses, and maybe even make it a little more fun along the way.
Key words:

Assessment Literacy, Feedback Strategies, Pre-Service Teacher Education

Abstract:

Assessment literacy is essential for teacher candidates, yet often taught through static rubrics and compliance-driven tasks. This session shares dynamic, student-centered methods from an undergraduate assessment course that make learning targets, feedback, and rubric use more engaging. Strategies include exemplar analysis, escape-room-style reviews, and AI-assisted feedback coaching. Participants will explore how these tools support deeper understanding of assessment principles while promoting learner autonomy. Grounded in feedback research and instructional design theory, these approaches offer low-prep, high-impact ways to reframe assessment as a learning experience rather than a grading ritual.

Outcomes:

1. Differentiate between traditional and student-centered approaches to teaching assessment literacy.

2. Apply exemplar-based analysis to improve clarity in feedback and rubric design.

3. Generate engaging, low-prep strategies that promote student ownership of assessment and feedback.

References:

Brookhart, S. M. (2013). The use of teacher feedback with students. In J. Hattie & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), International guide to student achievement (pp. 174–177). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203850398


Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354


Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2009). Effects of differential feedback on students’ examination performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15(4), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017841


Sadler, D. R. (2009). Indeterminacy in the use of preset criteria for assessment and grading. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801956059

Making a Difference Together

OUR PARTNERS

Goosechase_Icon_Black.png
JECT.png
Think UDL.png
Screen Shot 2023-02-07 at 8.43.31 AM.png
TiHE Bonni Stachowiak.jpg
Scholarly Teacher.png

OUR SPONSORS

Lilly Logo.png
OneHE Logo (Colour) - 640x200.jpg
EB no tagline.png
bottom of page