Escape the Rubric Rut: Creative Strategies for Teaching Assessment Literacy
Presented by:
Angela D. Nagel, Western Kentucky University
Engaging strategies like exemplars, escape rooms, and AI feedback help teacher candidates build assessment fluency and confidence in designing, analyzing, and applying effective feedback.

Hear it from the author:
Key words:
Assessment Literacy, Feedback Strategies, Pre-Service Teacher Education
Abstract:
Assessment literacy is essential for teacher candidates, yet often taught through static rubrics and compliance-driven tasks. This session shares dynamic, student-centered methods from an undergraduate assessment course that make learning targets, feedback, and rubric use more engaging. Strategies include exemplar analysis, escape-room-style reviews, and AI-assisted feedback coaching. Participants will explore how these tools support deeper understanding of assessment principles while promoting learner autonomy. Grounded in feedback research and instructional design theory, these approaches offer low-prep, high-impact ways to reframe assessment as a learning experience rather than a grading ritual.
Outcomes:
1. Differentiate between traditional and student-centered approaches to teaching assessment literacy.
2. Apply exemplar-based analysis to improve clarity in feedback and rubric design.
3. Generate engaging, low-prep strategies that promote student ownership of assessment and feedback.
References:
Brookhart, S. M. (2013). The use of teacher feedback with students. In J. Hattie & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), International guide to student achievement (pp. 174–177). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203850398
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2009). Effects of differential feedback on students’ examination performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15(4), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017841
Sadler, D. R. (2009). Indeterminacy in the use of preset criteria for assessment and grading. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801956059