top of page


All proposals undergo blind review. We greatly value the contribution that the blind review process makes in conference presentation selections and appreciate the time that our reviewers take from their busy schedule to assist us in our efforts to build a great program.




Gabriele Bauer, Villanova University
Michelle Davis, Lamar State College-Port Arthur
Peter Eberele, Penn State
Cub Kahn, Oregon State University
Elene Kent, Capital University
Karobi Moitra, Trinity Washington University
Chris Penna, University of Delaware
Mike Pinter, Belmont University
Aricka Schweitzer, Saginaw Valley State University
Marla J. Thompson, Life University
Kimberly Van Orman, University at Albany
Linda White, LeMoyne-Owen College




If you are interested in the opportunity to review proposals for the Lilly Conferences, click here to contact us. This obligation entails: reading 3-4 proposals, evaluating each using a given rubric, and making the recommendation that the proposal be A) accepted as submitted, B) accepted with revisions, or C) accepted in a different format than the author requested. If you have any questions about how the process works please do not hesitate to ask.

bottom of page