top of page

K–12 Teachers’ Enactments of Professional Agency During Collaborative Design

Presented by:

Megan Gibas, University of Michigan

We engaged in collaborative design to co-create place-based lessons in a Northern Alaskan community. Findings suggest flexible collaborations support professional agency and transformative teaching.

Hear it from the author:
K–12 Teachers’ Enactments of Professional Agency During Collaborative DesignMegan Gibas, University of Michigan
00:00 / 01:46
Hi! I'm Megan Gibas, and I’m a chemistry education researcher at The University of Michigan in the Shultz group. I’m going to be sharing about our research on three teachers’ professional agency during a collaborative design to co-create a series of place-based lessons in the Iñupiaq region of Northern Alaska. Little attention has been paid to understanding how teachers enact professional agency in Collaborative Design. We thus sought to collaborate with teachers to design these lessons and characterize how they exhibited professional agency. We drew upon conceptions of professional agency in educational reform literature, generally defined as the quality of engagement of actors in their current context according to the interplay between their professional past experiences (or iterational dimension), orientations towards their professional future (or projective dimension), and material, cultural, and structural present professional situations (or practical-evaluative dimension), represented by the figure shown here. We analyzed videos of individual and group design meetings through this lens of professional agency, specifically in relation to the community and culture and their students. We wrote case profiles illustrating our characterization. We found that teachers manifested professional agency across a spectrum in relation to incorporating the community and culture and considering their students. While the teachers actively participated in designing activities to engage their students, we saw more reserved agency around culture and community connections. I highlight several instances of active and reserved agency for the teachers in the quotes I selected here. Results indicate a flexible collaborative design can support teachers’ professional agency, and more support may be needed in areas of collaborative design where teachers are not as comfortable and/or exhibit more reserved agency.
Key words:

Professional Agency, Collaborative Design, Teacher Education

Abstract:

Little attention has been paid to understanding how teachers enact Professional Agency in Collaborative Design. Using a Case Study Approach, we analyzed three K-12 teachers’ enactment of Professional Agency during a Collaborative Design with teachers, researchers, and community members. The aim of the collaboration was to design a series of Place-based lessons centered around the emerging interests of a Northern Alaskan community. Results indicate how a flexible collaborative design process can support Professional Agency. Implications include supporting Professional Agency while helping teachers adopt transformative teaching practices by supporting connections between teacher beliefs, community, and culture.

Outcomes:

1. Reflect on the importance of Professional Agency for teachers in K-12 settings.

2. Assess how Collaborative Design between researchers and teachers can facilitate Professional Agency.

3. Better understand how designers can build bridges between teachers’ beliefs, culture, and community.

References:

Adah Miller, E., Berland, L., & Campbell, T. (2024). Equity for students requires equity for teachers: The inextricable link between teacher professionalization and equity-centered science classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 35(1), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2023.2170793


Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325


Preciado-Babb, A. P., & Liljedahl, P. (2012). Three cases of teachers’ collaborative design: Perspectives from those involved. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 12(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2012.649052


Priestley, M., Edwards, R., Priestley, A., & Miller, K. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum making: Agents of change and spaces for manoeuvre. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00588.x

Making a Difference Together

OUR PARTNERS

Goosechase_Icon_Black.png
JECT.png
Think UDL.png
Screen Shot 2023-02-07 at 8.43.31 AM.png
TiHE Bonni Stachowiak.jpg
Scholarly Teacher.png

OUR SPONSORS

Lilly Logo.png
OneHE Logo (Colour) - 640x200.jpg
EB no tagline.png
bottom of page