K–12 Teachers’ Enactments of Professional Agency During Collaborative Design
Presented by:
Megan Gibas, University of Michigan
We engaged in collaborative design to co-create place-based lessons in a Northern Alaskan community. Findings suggest flexible collaborations support professional agency and transformative teaching.

Hear it from the author:
Key words:
Professional Agency, Collaborative Design, Teacher Education
Abstract:
Little attention has been paid to understanding how teachers enact Professional Agency in Collaborative Design. Using a Case Study Approach, we analyzed three K-12 teachers’ enactment of Professional Agency during a Collaborative Design with teachers, researchers, and community members. The aim of the collaboration was to design a series of Place-based lessons centered around the emerging interests of a Northern Alaskan community. Results indicate how a flexible collaborative design process can support Professional Agency. Implications include supporting Professional Agency while helping teachers adopt transformative teaching practices by supporting connections between teacher beliefs, community, and culture.
Outcomes:
1. Reflect on the importance of Professional Agency for teachers in K-12 settings.
2. Assess how Collaborative Design between researchers and teachers can facilitate Professional Agency.
3. Better understand how designers can build bridges between teachers’ beliefs, culture, and community.
References:
Adah Miller, E., Berland, L., & Campbell, T. (2024). Equity for students requires equity for teachers: The inextricable link between teacher professionalization and equity-centered science classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 35(1), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2023.2170793
Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325
Preciado-Babb, A. P., & Liljedahl, P. (2012). Three cases of teachers’ collaborative design: Perspectives from those involved. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 12(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2012.649052
Priestley, M., Edwards, R., Priestley, A., & Miller, K. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum making: Agents of change and spaces for manoeuvre. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00588.x